Tucker got Nye to agree that the climate has always been changing.
Tucker tried time after time to get Nye to say how much of the change was due to humans …and time after time, Nye refused to say what his opinion was.
Then, in response to the question as to “what the climate would be like if humans weren’t involved right now”, Bill Nye said (according to my own transcription):
NYE: “The climate would be like it was in 1750. And the economics would be that you could not grow wine-worthy grapes in Britain as you can today because the climate is changing. The use of pesticides in the Midwest would not be increasing because the pests are showing up sooner and staying around longer. The forests in Wyoming would not be overwhelmed by pine bark beetles as it is because of climate change. That’s how the world would be different if it were not for humans”.
So which is it? Nye doesn’t know how much climate change is due to humans, but he does know that the climate would not have changed since 1750?
And then this devastating comment from Tucker:
CARLSON: You’re not even a scientist, you’re an engineer … So much of this you don’t know, you pretend that you know, and you gotta believe people who ask you questions.