Ah, yes, another counter-example.
As I’ve said before: global warming cannot be “global” and “warming” if there are record colds recurring around the globe. Via WUWT:
Temperatures plummeted across Australia’s south east on the weekend.
WAS it difficult getting out from under the doona this weekend? Did you shiver on the way to work this morning? Well spare a thought for the people of Deniliquin.
The mercury in the NSW town, close to the Murray River, sank to -5.6C early on Sunday morning — that’s the coldest it’s been for 110 years.
It was even more icy further north as winter records were broken across NSW and Victoria — some towns recorded their coldest morning ever.
It’s so freezing, the NSW Fire and Rescue Service has been forced to warn people not to fire up barbecues indoors.
How can record cold be a good a thing? Obviously the climate is oscillating with record highs and lows and it’s caused by human activity. I’ll give you credit for being stuck on a stale topic of ‘global warming’ instead of ‘global climate change’.
Record cold is not in and of itself a good thing. But you cannot continue to have record cold / record snowfall and call it global warming.
And your team was the one that changed the wording from global warming to climate change when it was obvious that the world wasn’t warming as predicted.
Then it was renamed “climate disruption” and now “carbon pollution”.
You can’t have it both ways. And renaming it doesn’t solve the fact that the climate has always been changing.