Peer-reviewed studies debunk climate alarmism

NewImage

The peer-review process has long been fraught with problems when it comes to global warming.

The infamous “Climategate” emails revealed global warming campaigners colluding to exclude research inconvenient to their narrative from academic journals.

Instead, time and again they issued over-the-top claims based on climate computer simulations.  Real-world observation revealed their models and their pronouncements to be fundamentally flawed.

Recently a growing number of academics have been publishing work that corrects the record.  The ability of the global warming campaign to pillory and exclude voices of reason may be running out.

 

40 New Studies: Nothing Unusual Happening in Climate Change | Principia Scientific International

Published on Written by James Delingpole The scare about global warming is overdone, according to more than 40 scientific papers published in just the first three months of 2018. What their charts clearly show is that “nothing climatically unusual is happening.”