Update: Less than an hour after I posted this, my favorite blog-stalker pops off with:
I am 57 years old. I have attended public schools in Los Angeles and North Idaho. While attending these public schools I NEVER heard or read the "taunt" that "doing well in school is a white trait."
Tom Hansen needs to get off the computer a little more often and do some reading and research. There has been three decades of research concerning racial identity and school success.
Do some reading, Tom-Tom. You’re an expert Googler and web-freeloader downloader. Here’s a place to start: "Racial Identity" "School Success"
Put that government school education to good use, Tom-Tom. Try doing some real reading and studying.
The current theory is that boys are failing in school because doing well in school is perceived as a feminine trait, prompting the “You’re so gay” harassment.
It’s similar to the taunt among African-Americans that doing well in school is a white trait.
From the New York Times:
Early this month, Carl Joseph Walker-Hoover, an 11-year-old boy from Springfield, Mass., hanged himself after months of incessantly being hounded by his classmates for being “gay.” (He was not; but did, apparently, like to do well in school.)
In March, 2007, 17-year-old Eric Mohat shot himself in the head, after a long-term tormentor told him in class, “Why don’t you go home and shoot yourself; no one will miss you.” Eric liked theater, played the piano and wore bright clothing, a lawyer for his family told ABC news, and so had long been subject to taunts of “gay,” “***,” “queer” and “homo.”
…
Being called a “***,” you see, actually has almost nothing to do with being gay.
It’s really about showing any perceived weakness or femininity – by being emotional, seeming incompetent, caring too much about clothing, liking to dance or even having an interest in literature. It’s similar to what being viewed as a “nerd” is, Bennington College psychology professor David Anderegg notes in his 2007 book, “Nerds: Who They Are and Why We Need More of Them”: “‘queer’ in the sense of being ‘odd’ or ‘unusual,’” but also, for middle schoolers in particular, doing “anything that was too much like what a goody-goody would do.”
It’s what being called a “girl” used to be, a generation or two ago.
“To call someone gay or *** is like the lowest thing you can call someone. Because that’s like saying that you’re nothing,” is how one teenage boy put it to C.J. Pascoe, a sociologist at Colorado College, in an interview for her 2007 book, “Dude, You’re a ***: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School.”
The message to the most vulnerable, to the victims of today’s poisonous boy culture, is being heard loud and clear: to be something other than the narrowest, stupidest sort of guy’s guy, is to be unworthy of even being alive.