I’m running a bit behind in getting some of these posts out.
At the final presidential debate, Bob Schieffer targeted the last question to education:
The question is this: the U.S. spends more per capita than any other country on education. Yet, by every international measurement, in math and science competence, from kindergarten through the 12th grade, we trail most of the countries of the world.
The implications of this are clearly obvious. Some even say it poses a threat to our national security.
Do you feel that way and what do you intend to do about it?
Great, great question. I really hope that all Americans watching fully took that in.
In response to the voucher question, McCain said
I’m sure you’re aware, Senator Obama, of the program in the Washington, D.C., school system where vouchers are provided and there’s a certain number, I think it’s a thousand and some and some 9,000 parents asked to be eligible for that.
Because they wanted to have the same choice that you and I and Cindy and your wife have had. And that is because they wanted to choose the school that they thought was best for their children.
And we all know the state of the Washington, D.C., school system. That was vouchers. That was voucher, Senator Obama. And I’m frankly surprised you didn’t pay more attention to that example.
Mike Petrilli translated into English:
“This is a program for 2,000 desperately poor families—families that have decided that private or parochial schools are the best fit for their children. It costs a mere pittance. But you would take this option away from those families, even when the Democratic mayor of Washington supports it, even when two former Democratic mayors support it, even when the superintendent of schools supports it, even when you send your own children to an elite private school? For those 2,000 children, vouchers are a lifeline, and you would cut it off?”
And regarding D.C. Schools Chancellor (and staunch Democrat) Michelle Rhee’s position on vouchers and the election, Jeff Chu interviewed her:
Rhee hasn’t shown much enthusiasm for either candidate, but told me earlier this year that McCain has the much stronger education policy from her point of view. "He isn’t great, but he hasn’t said he’s going to throw NCLB out—and now everyone who says I’m a right-wing wingnut is going to be like, 'I knew it!'" she said.
As for Obama, she told me in May that what he might do on education policy "terrifies me," even though she’s a staunch Democrat. She criticized his stance on No Child Left Behind, which she portrayed as “an ‘NCLB is evil, sucking the life out of teachers’ angle. It’s a total victim mentality.” (Obama did voice support for charters, which won’t be good news for his hard-core union supporters.)
Education should have been the topic of discussion in the 2008 Presidential debates. But the evil and stupid parties want to either throw more money at the problem or pretend like it doesn’t exist.