The LMT quotes the IEA President:
"Teacher pay is a huge issue and needs to be discussed," Wood said. "But we don't believe a continuing contract has anything to do with how you pay teachers."
How in the world can she say that? Teacher pay is based on a) how many years you have taught and b) how many college credits you receive. A continuing contract has *everything* to do with how much you pay teachers.
Nothing like tenure for life after 4 years with a guaranteed pay raise regardless of your performance.
Also, check out my post “How to Fire and Incompetent Teacher”. Compare that to what Shirley Ringo says below.
The following article ran in today’s Lewiston Tribune.
The prospect of barring a teacher from ever signing a continuing contract sounds like "union busting" to Sherri Wood, president of the Idaho Education Association.
"Teacher pay is a huge issue and needs to be discussed," Wood said. "But we don't believe a continuing contract has anything to do with how you pay teachers."
The union is writing its own proposal for paying more to exceptional teachers. The concept of some kind of "merit-based" pay has been around for decades.
Wood asked colleagues about teacher pay at a national conference in July. Of the many states looking at pay, none had pondered anything like what Geddes proposed.
"There weren't any state Legislatures or policy-makers planning to do something with alternative pay that had anything to do with continuing contracts," Wood said. "They were appalled that such a thing was even happening."
Idaho Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Luna has plugged $60 million into his budget request to the 2008 Legislature to boost teacher pay. But Luna said he won't ask for the money if lawmakers don't give him a way to spend the money on a "teacher performance" basis.
"Most people support increasing teacher pay," Luna told the Lewiston Tribune. "What they want to see is that teachers are rewarded by their good work in the classroom."
Luna prefers to boost pay based on such traits as student achievement, teaching skill and a teacher's willingness to help new teachers. But he doesn't discount Geddes' idea.
"I'm not saying I would not support a program that was presented - that was their (teachers') option to participate in - that addressed continuing contracts," Luna said. "That's open for discussion."
Rep. Shirley Ringo, D-Moscow, a member of the task force, said Geddes' idea is a bad one.
"Since it's specifically a union-busting type of legislation, it's divisive and, from that perspective, deplorable," Ringo said.
If lawmakers are serious about paying good teachers more, ideas already exist.
Idaho school districts developed "career ladders" to reward good teachers in 1983. After districts held meetings and hammered out plans, the Legislature failed to devote the money, Ringo said.
"Many school districts probably have something in their files that could be dusted off and considered."
As for whether it is too hard to fire a bad teacher, Ringo said most administrators simply lack the training to do it properly.
Really? Why is that? Check out my post “How to Fire and Incompetent Teacher”. There isn’t enough years and money to do so.
Geddes said his opposition to continuing contracts has nothing to do with "union-busting," even though the teachers' union angers many Republicans by supporting Democrats and moderate Republicans.
"I'm not saying I'm trying to bust the union," he said. "They can join the union whether they have a continuing contract or not."
Wood said pay and contracts should be separate issues.
"If we want to talk about continuing contracts, let's do that; let's make the contracts workable," Wood said. "If it's, 'we'll give you $3,000 if you give up continuing contracts,' we won't go there."