Today’s Moscow-Pullman Daily News carried a report about how the rural Latah County Schools are failing to meet the NCLB requirements.
The devil is in the details, as the saying goes.
Recall the previous post about Getting tough on truancy? As I said then: the only reason that MSD is getting tough on truancy now is because it’s costing them something. That something is both cash from the State (they are paid “per head” in daily attendance) and not meeting NCLB Annual Yearly Progress (AYP). Now we’re going to see other schools get tough on truancy as well.
But we wouldn’t have this problem to begin with if we stuck with the “no standards” policy for a high school diploma.
Rural schools in Latah County joined most of their state counterparts in failing to meet the Idaho Board of Education's annual progress requirements for the 2006-2007 school year.
Only 167 of 626 public schools in Idaho made "annual adequate yearly progress," which is measured by student performance on the Idaho Standards Achievement Test taken in the spring. The criteria is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act. Schools that did not perform as well or better than the previous year are put on alert with indications for which areas they missed their goals for the year.
"There's a couple of different messages from this: The test was tougher and benchmarks went up," SBOE spokesman Mark Browning said.
Browning explained that Idaho changed to a test vendor with a more stringent test, so this year's results cannot easily be compared to past years.
The NCLB breaks down district statistics by categorizing students by race, income level, disabilities and those learning English as a second language. The NCLB Act provides formulas by which the state evaluates districts, based on the percentage of students within a district who take the test, the district's graduation rate and a formula that determines a district's writing proficiency - called "language usage."
If one category of students fails to meet standards, a school and therefore its district fails the adequate yearly progress, or AYP, designation.
The Potlatch School District met its goals in math, but was put on alert by the state to improve reading proficiency for its 496 students.
Potlatch Superintendent Joseph Kren said the school already has pinpointed its problem.
"As we went back and looked, we had severe attendance issues last year," he said. "It was a challenge because several students had a high number of absences."
…
Merle Jaques, principal at Troy Elementary School and the test coordinator for the Troy School District, said the district's schools failed to meet their AYP goals because of a relatively small group of economically disadvantaged students who failed to progress.
The district has approximately 300 students, Jaques said.
Idaho categorizes students who qualify for free and reduced lunches separately from other students, and those students in the Troy district failed to meet math and reading proficiency.
Troy's "free and reduced lunch rate" is 46 percent at the elementary school and 35 percent at the high school, Jaques said.
"Since we have a smaller group that takes the test, if some students don't do as well, it shows up more," she said.
Should there be a 100% graduation rate? Listen to what Bertelsen says.
Daryl Bertelsen, superintendent of IDEA, said home school students tend to excel in reading and writing, but continually fail to meet math standards.
"We aren't all created equal," he said. "The state wants us to expect 100 percent from all the students. It isn't going to happen."
Bertelsen criticized NCLB for requiring districts to improve every year, because he said that's impossible.
"Eventually, everyone's going to fail AYP," he said.
Does the State expect 100% from all students? Or all students to pass? There is a difference.
Second, if a high school diploma means anything, it means that not everyone can get one. Otherwise, it is meaningless.
Which, in my opinion, it has been for years. It simply shows that everyone has been vertically promoted and survived. Nothing more.