Jim Fisher writes the following in today's Lewiston Tribune.
Four years ago, Luna talked as if the main problem the state's public schools faced was their teachers. He opposed increasing financial support for schools, even to the point of refusing to criticize legislators for cutting their appropriation for the first time in state history. And he proposed draining the appropriation further by siphoning off money for vouchers to parents of private school students.
"Attendance is mandatory, but learning is optional" served as his summation of public schools.
This year, Luna is speaking in less confrontational terms, enough so that he received the endorsement of the Idaho Statesman at Boise in the GOP primary. And he told the paper's columnist Dan Popkey that private school vouchers "won't work in Idaho."
"We'd have to change the constitution, and that's not going to happen," he explained.
That did not stop Luna, however, from telling sponsors of the Gem State Voter Guide -- a consortium of five right-wing interest groups -- that he supports tax credits for education, whatever that means. He also said he favors injecting some features of religious instruction into public schools, signaling support for teaching so-called intelligent design and the Bible "as literature and history" as well as for posting the Ten Commandments in classrooms.
I really have a hard time believing that Jim Fisher doesn’t understand what “tax credits for education” is.
I’m not happy with the “new Luna” either. He seems to have backed off of his educational reform positions of the past. While Jim Fisher may support the same-old same-old stuff, what we really need is educational reform in Idaho, not throwing more money down the same hole.
I think that Luna is right, though, that the Idaho Constitution would have to be changed to allow for vouchers/tax credits. So change it! Let’s work for educational reform that will give the parents the choice of sending their children to the best schooling option (government school, private school, homeschool, co-op, etc) for them.