An Explanation for the Decade-Long "Pause" in Global Warming?

Is there anything else that the climate computer models, which we rely on to predict future climate change, may have missed?

How many trillions of dollars are we willing to bet on it?

From the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration:

Observations from satellites and balloons show that stratospheric water vapor has had its ups and downs lately, increasing in the 1980s and 1990s, and then dropping after 2000. The authors show that these changes occurred precisely in a narrow altitude region of the stratosphere where they would have the biggest effects on climate.

Water vapor is a highly variable gas and has long been recognized as an important player in the cocktail of greenhouse gases—carbon dioxide, methane, halocarbons, nitrous oxide, and others—that affect climate.

“Current climate models do a remarkable job on water vapor near the surface. But this is different — it’s a thin wedge of the upper atmosphere that packs a wallop from one decade to the next in a way we didn’t expect,” says Susan Solomon, NOAA senior scientist and first author of the study.

Since 2000, water vapor in the stratosphere decreased by about 10 percent. The reason for the recent decline in water vapor is unknown. The new study used calculations and models to show that the cooling from this change caused surface temperatures to increase about 25 percent more slowly than they would have otherwise, due only to the increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

An increase in stratospheric water vapor in the 1990s likely had the opposite effect of increasing the rate of warming observed during that time by about 30 percent, the authors found.

Published Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:07 AM by Right-Mind
Filed under:

Comments

# re: An Explanation for the Decade-Long "Pause" in Global Warming?

How many hundreds of billions have been spent and how many years has this issue been studied by the preeminent scientists in the world with this explanation coming forth now?  It's hard for me to believe that water vapor, throughout the atmosphere, has been ignored in conjunction with the climate.  Will scientists now agree that water vapor has a much greater affect on the climate than does CO2?  I fear that scientists will divide among political lines again and we'll be fighting the leftward tug of our leaders/rulers.

Sunday, January 31, 2010 10:24 AM by varnel w.

# re: An Explanation for the Decade-Long "Pause" in Global Warming?

Follow the money..

Monday, February 01, 2010 7:17 AM by Right-Mind