February 2009 - Posts

Legislative Update # from Rep. Tom Trail

Moscow's Centrist Republican Tom Trail From Rep. Tom Trail (R-Moscow).

Constituents:

The old saying that the economy is everything is certainly true during this Legislative session. We are still trying to learn all of the details of the impact of the Obama Economic Stimulus Plan on the Idaho State Budget. For example, K-12 Education in Idaho will receive about $247 million for the support of K-12 and post-secondary education. Of that amount about $202 million is directly aimed at supporting K-12 and post-secondary education, and $45 million for public safety and governmental services (which will be under the control of the Governor). The requirement is that the Governor makes the determination of whether the allocation is sufficient to restore funding for public schools and higher education in FY09, 10, and 11. If the answer is yes then the move would be to restore the funds and if not then to allocate funding between public schools and higher education in proportion to their shortfall of state support.

  1. Public Education -- with the economic situation worsening (the loss of 2,000 more jobs in the Treasure Valley with Micron) projections are that there could be a shortfall of potentially $150 million in cuts in FY11 in revenues are flat. It appears that Legislative leadership wants to spread the stimulus money out over the three fiscal years rather than commit it all to FY09 and FY10. This would also be utilizing some of the "rainy" day funds to lessen the impact.
  2. The Stimulus Will Cost Idaho Some Funds -- Sen. Brent Hill, Senate Chair of the Senate Tax and Local Government Committee, indicates that some of the tax breaks in the stimulus package will cost Idaho about $14 million in lost revenue. Hill notes that one idea is to raise the top income tax rate by one-tenth of a percentage point. This would raise about $15 million. Senator. Hill also notes by delaying the implementation of the grocery credit we could gain another $15 million.

    As reported in previous newsletters, if the Idaho Legislature really wanted to look at some financial opportunities we have identified some opportunities:
    1. Review all of the 75 tax exemptions and if some are not benefitting the state then eliminate the--the added revenue would flow into the general revenue fund;
    2. Consider taxing internet sales (Idaho loses an estimated $60 million per year by not taxing internet sales);
    3. Reinstate Tax Commission auditors whose jobs were eliminated- the cost of the auditors was $ 1 million and they were bringing in about $6 million in unpaid taxes -- a $5 million gain for the state;
    4. Consider requiring motorcyclists to wear helmets (we lose about $4 million/year from federal highway funds).
  3. Beer and Wine Taxes -- This bill was defeated on a 13-5 vote in the House Tax and Revenue Committee. The estimated income of about $14 million would have been applied to drug rehab programs. I believe that another bill with a lower tax rate may be introduced later in the session.
  4. Good Economic News -- The University of Idaho College of Agriculture and Life Sciences indicates that the strongest component of Idaho's economy is the agriculture sector. It now represents about 20% of the state's GNP and contributes about 17% of the jobs. With the exception of the dairy sector, agriculture experienced positive growth both in 2007 and 2008. Agricultural exports continue to increase, and agricultural exports account for about 22,000 Idaho jobs. My report on agriculture to the JFAC Committee can be found on my website: http://www.infotrail.com/idaho/ click on the link labeled Presentation to JFAC
  5. Invasion of the Quaggas -- Invasive mussels pose a huge threat to Idaho waters. Both Zebra and quagga mussels have moved into Lake Mead and some western waters. The mussels can rapidly spread, but have not yet been detected in Idaho. Preventing them from entering the state via boats and trailers that have been in infested waters is critical since there are no practical means to eradicate the invaders once they take hold and multiple. One quagga mussel can produce over one million eggs. A report by the state estimates if the mussels enter Idaho waters there would be an estimated $94 million negative impact on the state's economy.
  6. HB121--The Idaho House by a 70-0 vote approved a tax credit for the Idaho Food Bank. The Food bank s role in the social safety net is to provide emergency food for those who need it. Statistics indicate that Idaho is the 24th hungriest state in the country.
  7. State Retiree Insurance -- The House voted 59-11 for a plan to push Medicare- eligible state government retirees off Idaho's insurance and onto private plans to reduce costs. People who retire early from the state government would get a $155 premium subsidy to stay on the state's plan, but they would switch to Medicare at age 65.

That's all for this week! Please send me your comments, suggestions, etc.

 

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

Obama's Gall

Henderson_davidr_biophotoDavid R. Henderson, Professor of Economics, editor of The Fortune Encyclopedia of Economics, and Research Fellow with the Hoover Institute. gave a radio interview to Scott Horton over at AntiWar.com.

You can listen to that interview here.

It’s a wide-ranging discussion of various current economic issues including:

  • The Obama budget,
  • The Bush-Paulson-Bernanke bailout,
  • Why most of the Republicans in Congress have zero credibility in pushing for small government,
  • The economics of imperialism,
  • Adam Smith's early use of public choice to explain British imperialism,
  • Why we don't need to go to war for oil,
  • why we are nowhere close to another Great Depression,
  • why I Ron Paul is wrong in predicting a world fiat currency, and
  • Robert Byrd's objections to Obama's continuation of Bush's aggrandizement of Presidential power.

This is well worth the listen. David Henderson is well known for being able to make difficult economic concepts easy for the layman to understand.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Adolf Hitler was a Keynesian

Try to separate Hitler’s murderous practices from his economics.

According to Lew Rockwell’s website, Hitler’s economic policies were Keynesian.

What were those economic policies? He suspended the gold standard, embarked on huge public works programs like Autobahns, protected industry from foreign competition, expanded credit, instituted jobs programs, bullied the private sector on prices and production decisions, vastly expanded the military, enforced capital controls, instituted family planning, penalized smoking, brought about national health care and unemployment insurance, imposed education standards, and eventually ran huge deficits. The Nazi interventionist program was essential to the regime's rejection of the market economy and its embrace of socialism in one country.

Such programs remain widely praised today, even given their failures. They are features of every "capitalist" democracy. Keynes himself admired the Nazi economic program, writing in the foreword to the German edition to the General Theory: "[T]he theory of output as a whole, which is what the following book purports to provide, is much more easily adapted to the conditions of a totalitarian state, than is the theory of production and distribution of a given output produced under the conditions of free competition and a large measure of laissez-faire."

Lew goes on to argue that governments powerful enough to control that many aspects of the economy are powerful enough to do the wicked deeds as well.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Obama's Auto Team Drives Imports

According to the Detroit News, only 2 of the 18 people who are aiding or are on Obama's new auto task force drive American cars.

Perhaps they should just ask themselves why they don’t buy American….

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

McCain's Top 10 List

Sen. John McCain released his “top ten porkiest projects” in the upcoming appropriations bill:

#10. $1.7M “for a honey bee factory” in Weslaco, TX

#9. $475,000 to build a parking garage in Provo City, Utah

#8. $200,000 “tattoo removal violence outreach program to could help gang members or others shed visible signs of their past” REALLY?

#7. $300,000 for the Montana World Trade Center - enough said

#6. $1 million for mormon cricket control in Utah - is that the species of cricket or a game played by the brits?

#5. $650,000 for beaver management in North Carolina and Mississippi

#4. $2.1 million for the Center for Grape Genetics in New York - quick peel me a grape.

#3. $332,000 for the design and construction of a school sidewalk in Franklin, Texas - not enough $ for schools in the stimulus?

#2. $2 million “for the promotion of astronomy” in Hawaii - because nothing says new jobs for average Americans like investing in astronomy

#1. $1.7 million for pig odor research in Iowa

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Tire shops disagree with bill banning studded tires

But in today’s climate, it’s not keeping people safe that matters; it’s keeping the roads cheap and smooth.

KREMFrom KREM News in Spokane:

Tom Dunn, the Alton’s Tires manager for their South Hill location, said he disagreed with the ban.  Dunn said the ban would cause more wrecks since he believes studded tires are the best tire for safe winter driving.

Dunn said the average person driving around Spokane doesn’t necessarily need studded tires to stay safe, but he says anyone who drives their personal car a lot or lives in outlying areas needs the studs.

In December, I could barely get around Moscow even with studded tires.

A representative from Les Schwab also spoke to KREM 2 News and agreed with Dunn’s assessments that the ban on studded tires would cause more wrecks and the two best alternatives to studded tires.

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

$81 billion blunder at the pump

He could have just asked Obama to bail him out…

KREMFrom KREM News in Spokane:

In a freak computer glitch, Juan Zamora’s gas bill jumped from 28 dollars to 81 billion.

And for a single father of one, that’s a little steep for one fill-up at a gas station in Richland.

Zamora commutes 100 miles to work everyday from Spokane to Hanford just north of the Tri-cities.  When he stopped at a Conoco gas station to fill up, the pump read 28 dollars for the sale.  But when he got home to Spokane after a full day of work, he got a huge surprise.

He got a message from his Paypal account notifying him of an 81-billion dollar charge. Turns out the gas station’s pump mixed the store’s merchant number up and placed it as the price of his gasoline.

Three days later, Zamora ironed things out with his bank. He cancelled the card he used but says the ordeal was a hassle.

Zamora says he will keep using the same gas station and even use the same pump.  He’s convinced it was a once in a million mistake.

Now that his accounts are restored, Zamora says he’s having some fun with what happened.  Friends at work are calling him the billion dollar man.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Another Day, Another Trillion

See: The Washington Examiner: Obama's Invoice

From the FRC:

In bold white script, the words "A New Era of Responsibility" are splashed across the cover of the President's new budget proposal. Unfortunately, the responsibilities outlined throughout its 142 pages are ours--all $3.6 trillion of them. In five weeks on the job, President Obama is on his way to racking up more national debt than President Bush did in five years (2001-2006). Under this spending plan, America would be saddled with a $1.8 trillion deficit in fiscal year 2009, the highest in U.S. history. This administration seems to operate under the slogan: Why quit while you're behind? Big government is back--along with big taxes, big promises, and what will certainly be big disappointments when generation after generation of taxpayers get the bill.

Among the budget highlights are some broad social policy shifts, including: a "down payment" on government-controlled health care ($634 billion), "greener" government through pricy climate research and buildings ($12.3 billion), another $5 million to Medicaid "family planning" efforts, a second, more costly bank bailout ($750 billion), and projected revenue from a "cap and trade" clamp on carbon emissions.

Today's edition of the D.C. Examiner itemizes the cost to American taxpayers in an invoice from the President, which totals $7,371,000,000,000.00. How does Obama expect to pay for everything? Charles Hurt of the New York Post writes, "Obama's budget schemes to drain staggering amounts of money from people who worked for it and steer it to people who didn't." According to some estimates, Americans can expect $1.5 trillion in tax increases by 2019. Obviously, one of the immediate casualties of the Obama era will be President Bush's tax cuts, which have provided real relief for American families. Although FRC lobbied to make the cuts permanent, they are almost certain to expire next year. The wealthy (those making $250,000 a year or more) are scheduled to take a punishing blow for their success with hikes in capital gains taxes, income taxes, employer taxes, and the resurrection of the estate tax.

But perhaps the most troubling element of the President's proposal is a deliberate--and debilitating--attack on charitable giving. To the dismay of people across the political spectrum, the White House has asked for a 20% reduction in the amount that upper-income people can deduct from their taxes for making charitable donations. For organizations already feeling the crunch of the recession, this could be a killing blow.

Under the current plan, no one would be immune. The new code would affect everything from think tanks to food banks. As the President is well aware, the pain would be particularly acute for the community of religious conservatives, who are more generous than political liberals in every measurable way. The move would hurt traditional-values charities most, since the government is already funding the far Left's agenda on abortion, environmentalism, welfare, the arts, and "family planning" with billions of tax dollars every year.

In effect, Obama would be squeezing out any programs that are not government approved. He claims the move would bring in roughly $32 billion a year--but at a much larger cost to philanthropy as a whole. If the provision passes, the White House would be well on its way to replacing the work of churches, nonprofits, and social service agencies with more government programs, which studies have proven to be a poor and ineffective substitute. Americans should be outraged. If there's one place that doesn't need our charity, it's Washington. 
 

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

The Obamaist Manifesto

An extract from an incredible article by Charles Krauthammer:

Reagan came to office to do something: shrink government, lower taxes, rebuild American defenses. Obama made clear Tuesday night that he intends to be equally transformative. His three goals: universal health care, universal education, and a new green energy economy highly funded and regulated by government.

  1. Obama wants to be to universal health care what Lyndon Johnson was to Medicare. Obama has publicly abandoned his once-stated preference for a single-payer system as in Canada and Britain. But that is for practical reasons. In America, you can't get there from here directly.

    Instead, Obama will create the middle step that will lead ultimately and inevitably to single-payer. The way to do it is to establish a reformed system that retains a private health-insurance sector but offers a new government-run plan (based on benefits open to members of Congress) so relatively attractive that people voluntarily move out of the private sector, thereby starving it. The ultimate result is a system of fully socialized medicine. This will likely not happen until long after Obama leaves office. But he will be rightly recognized as its father.
  2. Beyond cradle-to-grave health care, Obama wants cradle-to-cubicle education. He wants far more government grants, tax credits and other financial guarantees for college education -- another way station to another universal federal entitlement. He lauded the country for establishing free high school education during the Industrial Revolution; he wants to put us on the road to doing the same for college during the Information Age.
  3. Obama wants to be to green energy what John Kennedy was to the moon shot, its visionary and creator. It starts with the establishment of a government-guided, government-funded green energy sector into which the administration will pour billions of dollars from the stimulus package and billions more from budgets to come.

But just picking winners and losers is hardly sufficient for a president who sees himself as world-historical. Hence the carbon cap-and-trade system he proposed Tuesday night that will massively restructure American industry and create a highly regulated energy sector.

These revolutions in health care, education and energy are not just abstract hopes. They have already taken life in Obama's massive $787 billion stimulus package, a huge expansion of social spending constituting a down payment on Obama's plan for remaking the American social contract.

Obama sees the current economic crisis as an opportunity. He has said so openly. And now we know what opportunity he wants to seize. Just as the Depression created the political and psychological conditions for Franklin Roosevelt's transformation of America from laissez-faireism to the beginnings of the welfare state, the current crisis gives Obama the political space to move the still (relatively) modest American welfare state toward European-style social democracy.

Can 4 years of Obama and 2 years of Pelosi be undone before it become entrenched the way FDR’s transformation of America away from capitalism has become entrenched?

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Quotes of the Day

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy out of freedom.  What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.  The government cannot give to anybody, anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any Nation.

You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."

—Dr. Adrian Rogers

And another from a former East German.

"They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work".

And finally this:

“Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more, and more and more of the expensive goods, houses and technology pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until these become unbearable.  The unpaid debt will then lead to bankruptcy of banks which will have to be nationalized, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to Communism.”

—Karl Marx, 1867

HT: Dave S.

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban

From ABC News:

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder told reporters.

Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.

"I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum." Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S.

HT: Mike C.

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

AP Source: Obama to Rescind Bush Abortion Rule

From ABC News:

President Barack Obama plans to repeal a Bush administration rule that has become a flash point in the debate over a doctor's right not to participate in abortions. The regulation, instituted in the last days of the Bush administration, strengthened job protections for doctors and nurses who refuse to provide a medical service because of moral qualms.

A Health and Human Services official said Friday the administration will publish notice of its intentions early next week, opening a 30-day comment period for advocates on both sides, medical groups and the public.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the notice has not been completed.

The Bush administration rule was quickly challenged in federal court by several states and medical organizations. As a candidate, President Barack Obama criticized the regulation and campaign aides promised that if elected, he would review it.

"It would be a horrible move. These regulations were a long time coming," said Tom McClusky, a vice president at Family Research Council. "What they seek to do is protect patients, nurses, doctors and other health care professionals from being forced to violate their consciences."

McClusky and other abortion opponents said the Bush regulation clarified federal policies and raised awareness about the rights of medical providers to follow their consciences.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Moscow's Karl Tyler Motors closing shop

You heard it here first on this blog.

As reported in the Moscow-Pullman Daily News.

Moscow's Karl Tyler Motors will close its doors for good March 6.

Owner Karl Tyler acknowledged business has slowed in recent months, but said the health difficulties of his business partner and day-to-day manager Mike Fredrickson, coupled with his own desire to slow down, spurred their decision to close the dealership more than the slumping fortunes of the American auto industry.

"I'm just ready to retire," said Tyler, who bought the General Motors dealership three years ago after starting there as a car washer in 1967. "We only came to this decision a few days ago. I haven't even tried to find a buyer (for the dealership) because there's not a real market out there of people who want to get into the auto industry right now."

Tyler said much of the business will consolidate with Tyler and Kelly Trademark Motors in Lewiston, where he also has an ownership stake. Tyler also owns dealerships in Missoula, Mont., and Dillon, Mont.

The decision to close won't affect warranty agreements with Karl Tyler Motors customers.

"We'll be able to take care of people who bought vehicles from us," he said.

Tyler said he has no plans to close his remaining dealerships. He said most of the employees at the Moscow business will have an opportunity to transfer to Lewiston. He also offered people jobs at the Montana dealerships. He said he couldn't speculate as to what his employees might decide to do.

So Moscow is the only dealership that’s closing…

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Moscow's Karl Tyler Motors Going Out of Business?

I hear that Moscow's Karl Tyler Motors is going out of business.

They are the local Buick/Chevrolet/GMC/Pontiac dealer.

Can anyone confirm whether that is the case?

Posted by Right-Mind | 2 comment(s)

The Truth about Medical Bankruptcies

Nothing like the President playing fast and loose with the numbers in order to create a crisis that he alone can fix.

From Cato-at Liberty:

During his speech to Congress last night, President Obama declared that health care costs “causes a bankruptcy in America every thirty seconds.” His numbers are just a little bit off.

If what President Obama said were true, there would be approximately 1.05 million health care related bankruptcies in this country every year. However, in 2007 (the last full year for which there is data available, there were a total of only 815,000 non-business bankruptcies nationwide. Moreover, according to a study by Dr. Ning Zhu at UC-Davis, only 5 percent of bankruptcies are caused by medical bills. That suggests that in 2007 there were about 41,000 health care related bankruptcies. Too many, to be sure, but a far cry for 1.05 million.

Haven’t we learned from those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that facts matter when a president says we absolutely have to do something now?

 Be very, very leery when a politician says that they need to do something now.

And remember the words of Vice President Biden:

“Opportunity presents itself in the middle of a crisis.”

—Vice President Joe Biden, on ABC’s Good Morning America.

The Obama administration is the first to publicly and proudly announce that they intend to use the crisis to force through an agenda that wouldn’t otherwise be possible.

Change we can count on.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Americans Know their Cell Phone Bills better than the Constitution

From Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas:

As I have traveled across the country, I have been astounded just how many of our fellow citizens feel strongly about their constitutional rights but have no idea what they are, or for that matter, what the Constitution says. I am not suggesting that they become Constitutional scholars — whatever that means. I am suggesting, however, that if one feels strongly about his or her rights, it does make sense to know generally what the Constitution says about them. It is at least as easy to understand as a cell phone contract — and vastly more important.

— Clarence Thomas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, October 16, 2008 speech

HT: C-Pol

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Obama administration surprised, dismayed at its own immigration enforcement action

There are some doozies here. Check out the Orwellian phrase “Bush-era immigration raids.”

Illegal immigrants are “illegal”, and the Dems want to “get to the bottom of this.”

Priceless.

WashingtonTimesLogoFrom The Washington Times:

Immigrant rights groups blasted President Obama on Wednesday for breaking what they called his "personal commitment" to change Bush-era immigration raids after U.S. authorities raided an engine machine shop in Washington state and detained illegal immigrants.

The Obama administration itself seemed taken aback by the raid by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano vowing to Congress that she would "get to the bottom of this."

HT: C-Pol

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

How much will the stimulus cost Idaho? The package could lower tax revenues by $14 million in 2010

From the Idaho Statesman:

Even though the federal stimulus package could bring $1 billion into Idaho, it'll also take money away.

While the State Tax Commission still must verify his numbers, Sen. Brent Hill, a Rexburg Republican and certified public accountant, estimates that Idaho income tax revenue could be about $14 million lower in fiscal year 2010 because of one-time tax breaks provided by the new federal stimulus law.

But lawmakers already are scrounging for every penny as revenues fall short of projections. 

The fed giveth and the fed taketh.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Gov't says 'mass layoffs' soared in January

From the Associated Press:

Employers took a large ax to their payrolls in January, the government said Wednesday, and the cuts are likely to get worse over the next few months.

The Labor Department reported that mass layoffs, or job cuts of 50 or more by a single employer, increased to 2,227 in January, up almost 50 percent from the same month last year. More than 235,000 workers were fired in last month's cuts.

January was a bad month for the labor market. Companies from a wide range of sectors announced tens of thousands of layoffs, including Home Depot Inc., Boeing Co., Pfizer Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.

Not all of those cuts were reflected in the government's mass layoffs report, which counts actual firings as reported by laid-off workers seeking unemployment benefits. Many of the layoffs announced in January will take place over time, meaning that the department's mass layoff figures will likely keep increasing.

Seems like a great time to raise taxes and socialize medicine <tongue firmly implanted in mouthcheek…>

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

Older Americans the Least Worried About Money; Worry About Money Peaks With Forty-Somethings

Uh, yea. Those in the 70–89 year range are going to die before the full consequences of all this socializing/nationalizing are realized. The the 40–somethings (that’s me!) are going to be left holding the bag and trying to pay for it.

TANSTAAFL!

Recent polls of interest from the Gallup Organization:

 Older Americans the Least Worried About Money: An aggregate of Gallup Poll Daily tracking data collected in February reveals that Americans aged 70 to 89 are the least likely to say they are worried about money, while those aged 40 to 49 are the most likely to be worried.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Rasmussen Poll of the Day

From the Rasmussen Reports:

 "Angel Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 59% of U.S. voters agreed with Ronald Reagan that “government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Presidential Quote of the Day

“As soon as I took office, I asked this Congress to send me a recovery plan by President’s Day… Not because I believe in bigger government — I don’t. Not because I’m not mindful of the massive debt we’ve inherited — I am.”

—President Obama to congressional joint session, February 24

 

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Obama’s $1.3 Trillion Tax Hike

Cato_headerFrom Cato-at Liberty:

Here are some notes on the tax proposals in the new federal budget:  (See Table S-6; All figures are 10-year totals)

  • There are $770 billion in “tax cuts for families and individuals.”  However, the fine print on page 129 shows that $326 billion of that is actually spending, or the “refundable” portion of the tax changes. That leaves a net $444 billion in tax cuts for individuals.
  • The budget would impose a $646 billion tax increase from new “climate revenues,” which would create a burden on families in the form of higher energy prices.  Thus, there is a net tax hike on “families” of about $202 billion, even aside from the income tax increases at the top end.
  • Income tax increases on those with higher incomes total $637 billion. Note that these hikes land on both individual filers and the huge number of small businesses that file through the individual system.
  • Other tax hikes on businesses total a net $183 billion.
  • Finally, Obama proposes to limit deductions for higher earners to raise $318 billion.
  • Thus, President Obama proposes to hike taxes by a net $1,340 billion, or about $1.3 trillion, over the next decade. That’s the last thing we need to recover from recession and to compete in the global economy in coming years.  

 

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Obama budget meets with sticker shock: Proposal, filled with political land mines, would create deficit in the trillions

That is the title from the Associated Press!

President Obama charted a dramatic new course for the nation Thursday with a bold but contentious budget proposing higher taxes for the wealthy and the first steps toward guaranteed health care for all - accompanied by an astonishing $1.75 trillion federal deficit that would be nearly four times the highest in history.

Is there anyone who can stop this juggernaut?

Denouncing what he called the "dishonest accounting" of recent federal budgets, Obama unveiled his own $3.6 trillion blueprint for next year, a bold proposal that would transfer wealth from rich taxpayers to the middle class and the poor.

Congressional approval without major change is anything but sure. The plan is filled with political land mines including an initiative to combat global warming that would hit consumers with considerably higher utility bills. Other proposals would take on entrenched interests such as big farming, insurance companies and drug makers.

Obama blamed the expected federal deficit explosion on a "deep and destructive" recession and recent efforts to battle it including the Wall Street bailout and the just-passed $787 billion stimulus plan. The $1.75 trillion deficit estimate for this year is $250 billion more than projected just days ago because of proposed new spending for a fresh bailout for banks and other financial institutions.

As the nation digs out of the most serious economic crisis in decades, Obama said, "We will, each and every one of us, have to compromise on certain things we care about but which we simply cannot afford right now."

Signaling budget battles to come, Republicans were skeptical Obama was doing without much at all.

"We can't tax and spend our way to prosperity," said House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio. "The era of big government is back, and Democrats are asking you to pay for it."

Obama plans to move aggressively toward rebalancing the tax system, extending a $400 tax credit for most workers - $800 for couples - while letting expire President George W. Bush's tax cuts for couples making more than $250,000 a year. That would raise the top income tax bracket from 35 percent to 39.6 percent for those taxpayers and raise their capital gains rate from 15 to 20 percent as well.

Thursday's 134-page budget submission, a nonbinding recommendation to Congress, says the plan would close the deficit to a a more reasonable - but still eye-popping - $533 billion after five years. That would still be higher than last year's record $455 billion deficit.

And the national debt would more than double by the end of the upcoming decade, raising worries that so much federal borrowing could drive up interest rates and erode the value of the dollar.

Also, to narrow the budget gap, Obama relies on rosier predictions of economic growth - including a 3.2 percent boost in the economy next year - than most private sector economists foresee.

When you increase taxes, you lower economic growth. Those two go hand-in-hand.

There is already resistance from Democrats who are upset with the budget's plan to curb the ability of wealthier people to reduce their tax bills through deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions and state and local taxes.

That tax hike would raise $318 billion over the upcoming decade toward a down payment on Obama's high-priority universal health care plan. Cuts to the Medicare and Medicaid federal health programs would supply an additional $316 billion, but that still wouldn't provide enough money to guarantee coverage for all, and Obama wants Congress to come up with hundreds of billions of dollars in additional hard-to-raise revenues to pay for the rest.

Then there is the proposed clampdown on the Pentagon budget, which would get a 4 percent boost, to $534 billion next year, but would then get increases of 2 percent or less over the next several years. Domestic programs favored by Democrats would, on average, receive a 7 percent boost over regularly appropriated levels - even as many agencies are already swimming in cash from the just-enacted economic stimulus plan.

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

Credit is Not Capital

I’ve said it here before: you cannot create capital by printing more money. Credit isn’t capital.

Here’s a Ron Paul jewel. This was while he was lecturing Bernanke about sound money principles he unleashed this nugget.

“This is the end of an era. We can’t reinflate the bubble. If we think that we can reinflate this bubble by artificially creating credit out of thin air and calling it capital, believe me we dont have a prayer of solving these problems - we have a total misunderstanding of what credit is versus capital.”

HT: Adam S

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

FY2009 Deficit = FY2000 Spending

  • Total federal spending in FY2000:  $1.79 Trillion.
  • Total estimated FY2009 deficit according to today’s budget blueprint: $1.75 Trillion.

HT: Cato

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Majority Oppose Congressional Aid to Automakers

It won’t matter. The Dems are in control and they are in the pockets of the unions.

Recent polls of interest from the Gallup Organization:

  • Majority Oppose Congressional Aid to Automakers: Fifty-eight percent of Americans oppose Congress giving aid to U.S. automakers who are in danger of going bankrupt and 41% are in favor.
  • Americans Reject Sequel to Auto Bailout: Nearly three-quarters of Americans, 72%, say Congress should not authorize the $21 billion in federal loans -- over and above the $17 billion in loans last year -- that General Motors and Chrysler want to keep them running.
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments
More Posts Next page »