March 2006 - Posts

Vera: Wrong about Wal-Mart

Vera White writes the following in her Ink Spoltch today:

Sources say Wal-Mart has taken an option on property at the proposed Hawkins Development shopping center on the Pullman-Moscow Highway.

The Moscow-Pullman Daily News reported Feb. 15 that the Hawkins Companies submitted an application to Whitman County in January to build a shopping complex along the highway just west of the Idaho state line. As reported in the article, the proposed development would be seven times as large as Pullman’s Wheatland Mall, and about twice the size of the Palouse Mall in Moscow.

The INKster’s unrelated sources told her that should a super store go in at this site, the current Wal-Mart facility would be used as a distribution center for other Wal-Mart stores in the area.

OK, let me tell you why she's wrong about the last paragraph.
  1. Wal-Mart distribution facilities are huge -- many, many times larger than what we have
    at the current store.
  2. Wal-Mart distribution facilities are located at excellent transportation locations -- e.g., where there are major interstates and traffic. Moscow is not a transportation hub; and won't be until an interstate comes thru here.
One of the following three things is going to happen:
  1. Wal-Mart will open a Supercenter right across the state line and then close the Moscow Wal-Mart (our #1 private employer!).
  2. Wal-Mart will put a store in Latah County outside of Moscow City limits and city control; and then close the current Moscow store.
  3. Wal-Mart will cut its losses, close the Wal-Mart in Moscow, and let everyone drive 5-miles to Pullman to shop (still a much better option than driving to Lewiston to go to Costco!).
Either way, we will lose our current Wal-Mart's tax revenue to the Moscow City coffers. And recall: Wal-Mart is the largest private employer in Moscow.

No, Moscow isn't anti-growth and anti-business.
Posted by Right-Mind | 3 comment(s)
Filed under: ,

Tom Forbes has the No-Growth Moscowans' Number!

Tom Forbes over at Palousitics has the number on our no-growth liberals.

They don't want no stinking growth here (Moscow); they don't want no stinking growth there (Pullman/Whitman County);  they don't want no stinking growth anywhere!

Tom writes:
I know there are many rational, pro-growth people in Moscow. But they were asleep at the switch last November (thank God we weren’t here in Pullman). As my grandmother used to say, “You’ve made your bed, now you have have to lay in it”.
Moscow Councilman Aaron Ament said he does not believe there is a no-growth ideal in the county.
BWHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!!! Give me a break. Take a look at what some of Ament’s buddies and supporters at the Moscow Civic Association have had to say about growth over at the “Vision 2020” message board the last few months. Look especially for posts by Bill London, Joe Campbell, Mark Solomon, Nils Peterson, Tom Hansen, Joan Opyr, Keely Mix, and Wayne Fox:
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
Then there is the No Super Wal-Mart group’s site and blog.

Peruse those sites and tell me there isn’t a “no-growth” ideal in Moscow. I have heard of "bombing them back to the Middle Ages", but now we have "zoning them back to the Middle Ages". The hippies want to take Moscow back into the pre-industrial age with “homespun cottage industries” making clay pots and other “environmentally friendly”, “fair trade” goods. More power to ‘em. Just leave us out of it, please. We’re trying to have a 21st Century economy, not a 13th Century one where Pullman is a fiefdom of Moscow.
Yea. It's obvious to everyone in the world what's going on in Moscow.

The Political Theory of Moscow

Mack Tanner lives in Moscow and is a retired American diplomat.

He is also a free-lance writer, and has an article in the Foundation for Economic Education titled The Fascist Epithet.

For all right-minded readers: take the time to study this essay. He tells us exactly what we see going on in Moscow:
"a political philosophy in which a strong central government permits, but regulates and taxes, private wealth and property in order to achieve the utopian socialist ideal."
And that political theory is another name for?

HT: Jack Wenders

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

News Flash: Basilio's Is Not Going Out of Business!!!

From Jeff M:
Basilio's included a one-page flyer in the Argonaut today that includes some of their menu specialties, boasts that the Argonaut named them "Best Italian Food!" and "Most romantic restaurant," and announces that they have a "New Catering Menu Available."

So I guess they're not going out of business after all...
This has to be the most miraculous turn-around in history. In just three days to go from "going out of business" to "back in business".

Congrats!
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Working at the Moscow Wal-Mart

Mat, who used to work at the Wal-Mart here in Moscow, had this to say to the Wal-Mart bashers on V2020:
I ask that you forgive anytyping erorrs, time is short and cafe internet costs.  I have been following your debates about the  supercenter, and I heard chatter the last time I was in Moscow.

I am a former wal mart employee.  I have to tell all of you that wal mart was the best pay I received while living in Moscow for more than 13 years. I worked a variety of jobs, frequently at the same time in order to pay  for school, rent, and the small other pleasures in life.  The pay was  not great, but it was better than most.

I was not always thrilled with the medical plan at wal mart, but it was a medical plan which allowed me to escape paying the for the U of I  medical plan in my last few years there.  None of the other jobs I  worked at even had a plan for part time employees.

Wal mart was the only company which gave me paid vacations after a year.  I was amazed.  A whole week off, paid!

It is okay if you hate wal mart.  I just thought you should know what it is like from the student perspective.  For me, Wal Mart served a  purpose, just as the other business did, a means to an end.  I have my  degrees and have left Moscow.
He added the following off-list to me in a private email:
"Wal Mart paid me a wage of more than $2 per hour than any of my other jobs."
Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Plumbers Union is Pissed

This stuff is just too good for me to make up.

From the Chicago Sun Times:

PHILADELPHIA -- This city's hoped-for bragging rights as home of America's tallest environmentally friendly building could go down the toilet.

In a city where organized labor is a force to be reckoned with, the plumbers union has been raising a stink about a developer's plans to install 116 waterless, no-flush urinals in what will be Philadelphia's biggest skyscraper.

Developer Liberty Property Trust says the urinals would save 1.6 million gallons of water a year at the 57-story Comcast Center, expected to open next year.

But the union put out the word it doesn't like the idea of waterless urinals -- fewer pipes means less work.

The city's licensing department, whose approval is needed for waterless urinals, has not yet rendered a decision.

The mayor's office has stepped in to try to save the urinals, which use a cartridge at the base to trap odors and sediment as waste passes through.

It is telling the plumbers that the city's building boom will provide plenty of work for them and that even waterless urinal systems need some plumbing connections, said Stephanie Naidoff, city commerce director.

Philadelphia's unions have periodically put the city in a difficult spot.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

The Difference: Simply Put

Swami Nick Gier -- Intellectual Leader of the IntoleristaDedicated to Nick Gier, who still cannot tell the difference.

  • "Wherever you find the infidels, kill them, for whoever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection. Know that paradise is under the shade of the swords." Muhammad of Mecca (c. 570-632)
  • "But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Jesus of Nazareth (c. 4 BC-30)

Via King's Meadow




Posted by Right-Mind | 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

Gem State Voter Guide

The Idaho Values Alliance is sending the following voter guide today to all the Idaho candidates.

I'll let you know when their results are posted.

GEM STATE VOTER GUIDE

A joint project of the Idaho Values Alliance, Idaho Chooses Life, Idahoans for Tax Reform, and This House is MY Home

2006 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CANDIDATES FOR STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

FUNDING

1.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Fund Idaho public education without raising the Idaho sales tax by 1%.

2.  Support ___     Oppose ___     More efficient use of existing school funds rather than increased funding.

3.  Support ___     Oppose ___     A merit pay system to reward superior teachers.

4.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Higher pay for math and science teachers.

5.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Maintain the super-majority on school bond issues.

CHOICE IN EDUCATION

6.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Remove the cap on charter school expansion.

7.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Reduce regulations for charter schools.

8.  Support ___     Oppose ___     De-consolidation of larger school districts to bring schools closer to parents.

9.  Support ___     Oppose ___     Give school principals more authority to manage their schools according to local conditions.

10. Support ___     Oppose ___     Open enrollment among public schools with funds following the student.

11. Support ___     Oppose ___     Education tax credits to expand parental choice in education.

12. Support ___     Oppose ___     No required registration of home-schooled students with local school districts.

13. Support ___     Oppose ___     No required state testing for home-schooled students.

14. Support ___     Oppose ___     Alternate teacher certification.

EDUCATION REFORM

15. Support ___     Oppose ___     Repeal requirement that school districts engage in collective bargaining with the teachers' union.

16. Support ___     Oppose ___     Extend the probationary period for tenure to seven years, as in Idaho's colleges and universities.

17. Support ___     Oppose ___     Require each school district to web post all school employees' salary and benefits.

18. Support ___     Oppose ___     Require each school district to web post its contract with the teacher’s union.

19. Support ___     Oppose ___     Require each school district to web post ISAT scores, and percent met of Expected Yearly Growth, for each teacher.

KINDERGARTEN AND PRE-SCHOOL

20. Support ___     Oppose ___     No mandatory, universal kindergarten.

21. Support ___     Oppose ___     No state-funded pre-school programs.

INSTRUCTION

22. Support ___     Oppose ___     Total immersion for limited English students.

23. Support ___     Oppose ___     Teach the Bible as literature and history in the public schools.

24. Support ___     Oppose ___     Teach Intelligent Design as an alternative to evolution in public schools.

VALUES

25. Support ___     Oppose ___     The posting of the Ten Commandments in classrooms.

26. Support ___     Oppose ___     Require parental permission for student involvement in school-sanctioned clubs such as the Gay-Straight Alliance.

27. Support ___     Oppose ___     Abstinence-only sex education in public schools.

28. Support ___     Oppose ___     Teach that sexual intimacy should be reserved exclusively for marriage between one man and one woman.

29. Support ___     Oppose ___     Prohibiting Planned Parenthood’s access to our public schools to teach “sex education” or to provide counseling services.

30. Support ___     Oppose ___     Prohibiting school counselors from referring students for abortions.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments
Filed under: ,

From the Objectivists: The New Individualist

The Winter 2006 issue of The New Individualist from the The Objectivist Center.

Winter 2006 cover.JPG
Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

The Dem's National Security Plan is Out

The Dem's national security plan is out. 

HT: Michelle Malkin & Expose the Left

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

A Secret No More

Idaho Senator Larry Craig discusses Idaho's economy and sizzling job market.

http://craig.senate.gov/releases/ed033006a.htm
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Marriage Melee over Adoption

Greg Jones writes about a bill coming out of Arizona that has raised a stink:

An Arizona adoption bill premised on the historically uncontroversial idea that married couples provide the most stable environment for raising children has encountered fierce opposition for allegedly being discriminatory against homosexual and single parents. The bill states that when all other factors are equal, married couples will be given preference in the adoption of children over non-married couples and single parents. An Arizona homosexual group, the Arizona Human Rights Fund, claims that the bill is “a shady attempt to undermine our rights to adopt.”

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)

Immigration Without Assimilation

Peggy Noonan has an article in the WSJ Opinion Journal about the difference between immigration today and immigration in yesteryear. She argues that the problem isn't immigration but assimilation.

Remember, today's liberals insist that America isn't a "melting pot" but rather a "salad bowl".

Is that the reason for much of the tensions in the country today?

There are a variety of things driving American anxiety about illegal immigration and we all know them--economic arguments, the danger of porous borders in the age of terrorism, with anyone able to come in.

But there's another thing. And it's not fear about "them." It's anxiety about us.

It's the broad public knowledge, or intuition, in America, that we are not assimilating our immigrants patriotically. And if you don't do that, you'll lose it all.

We used to do it. We loved our country with full-throated love, we had no ambivalence. We had pride and appreciation. We were a free country. We communicated our pride and delight in this in a million ways--in our schools, our movies, our popular songs, our newspapers. It was just there, in the air. Immigrants breathed it in. That's how the last great wave of immigrants, the European wave of 1880-1920, was turned into a great wave of Americans.

We are not assimilating our immigrants patriotically now. We are assimilating them culturally. Within a generation their children speak Valley Girl on cell phones. "So I'm like 'no," and he's all 'yeah,' and I'm like, 'In your dreams.' " Whether their parents are from Trinidad, Bosnia, Lebanon or Chile, their children, once Americans, know the same music, the same references, watch the same shows. And to a degree and in a way it will hold them together. But not forever and not in a crunch.

So far we are assimilating our immigrants economically, too. They come here and work. Good.

But we are not communicating love of country. We are not giving them the great legend of our country. We are losing that great legend.

What is the legend, the myth? That God made this a special place. That they're joining something special. That the streets are paved with more than gold--they're paved with the greatest thoughts man ever had, the greatest decisions he ever made, about how to live. We have free thought, free speech, freedom of worship. Look at the literature of the Republic: the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Federalist papers. Look at the great rich history, the courage and sacrifice, the house-raisings, the stubbornness. The Puritans, the Indians, the City on a Hill.

The genius cluster--Jefferson, Hamilton, Adams, Madison, Franklin, all the rest--that came along at the exact same moment to lead us. And then Washington, a great man in the greatest way, not in unearned gifts well used (i.e., a high IQ followed by high attainment) but in character, in moral nature effortfully developed. How did that happen? How did we get so lucky? (I once asked a great historian if he had thoughts on this, and he nodded. He said he had come to believe it was "providential.")

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Dating "Discrimination"

Chapman notes that eHarmony is being sued for not hooking-up a married guy.
A California lawyer is suing eHarmony claiming the online matchmaker discriminated against him when it refused to help him find a date because he was married. The company, which has an "unmarried only" policy, said 36-year-old John Claassen will be welcome to join after his impending divorce is finalized. "I just think I've got a right as an individual trying to recover from something that wasn't the high point of my life," Claassen said. "If that includes dating now, why can't I?"
Can't discriminate against adulterers, can we...
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Best Buy Planning Layoffs

The Seattle PI reports that Best Buy is planning layoffs.

Contrast this to Wal-Mart, which is adding 100,000+ jobs to the labor force this year alone -- while at the same time the unions are spending tens of millions of dollars to prevent Wal-Mart from growing.
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments
Filed under:

Everyone is a Victim

If boys are an oppressed class, and if girls are an oppressed class, who’s left?

See Heather Mac Donald's "Everyone’s a Victim".




Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Latah County Commissioners and Moscow City Council Joint Meeting

KQQQ carried an audio report this morning with an update on the Latah County Commissioners and Moscow City Council Joint Meeting yesterday.

Listen to the hysterical [DMC: as in funny, not ranting] comments from the Moscow City Council (especially Aaron Ament) about being upset that Moscow is perceived as being anti-business, and blaming the business community for fostering that opinion.

Of course, what they want is their growth. They want Moscow to look like Carmel (California). As long as it grows the way they want it to grow (fill-up downtown; nothing more), then they are "pro-growth".

But they don't consider turning down a Supercenter as being anti-growth. Nah!

Listen Here.

Posted by Right-Mind | 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

Mubita Trial Update

KQQQ carried an audio report this morning with an update on the Mubita trial.

Listen Here.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Answers Should Come Soon On Fate Of Plans For Property Tax Relief: Two Competing Proposals Approved By Committees

As reported in today's edition of the Idaho Statesman:

Property tax relief is not dead yet in the Idaho Statehouse, but there may be just as little agreement among the 105 lawmakers as there was in January when the session began.

Some bills are tied up by legislative leaders and others hijacked and rewritten line-for-line.

But two competing proposals passed legislative committees Wednesday morning, which means we could find out soon what majorities in the House and Senate are willing to do.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

The Importance of Church on the Palouse

Pastor James Hillbrick of the Princeton Church of the Nazarene has an excellent "Town Crier" column in today's paper.

If he keeps talking like this, he may find Intoleristas knocking on his door accusing him of tax evasion and of all other sorts of transgressions.
On Friday’s Daily News church page one can find the listing of a majority of formal and organized churches in the Palouse area.

There are approximately 45 churches listed on that page. If you take even a cursory glimpse at national church statistics, they indicate there are approximately 50 to 75 people in the average church across the United States. This then means on any given Sunday there are (let’s see, that’s 45 times 75 equals 3,375) nearly 4,000 people involved directly in Sunday morning worship times on the Palouse. This is a low-end guess because that number does not include independent church work, home church groups, college groups, individual Christians not attending at all, or simply those not choosing to put an ad in the Friday church page. So I am rounding the numbers to estimate about 5,000 people are in some way spending time each week in some form of worship of God and celebrating the blessings we have in this country.

That also means at least 5,000 Godly people (remember, this is a low-end estimate) are living, working, schooling, buying, and selling in our community. This means these people are involved in education, construction, administration, politics, law enforcement, social work, retail, and retirement (and other things too numerous to mention). The shear number of people who believe in one God, the creator, and who believe in the importance of acknowledging a divine power outside of ourselves as a source of help for us and our planet also indicates that religious influence is just simply here, not some planned conspiracy, not some subversive manipulative secret society. The church is just here. It’s a part of our life and our culture.

This God-centered worldview is not imposed or pushed onto an unwilling people. It’s what community after community after community believes and accepts.

Actually, it’s amazing to me that there isn’t far more religious influence on everything that happens here in the Palouse.

Of course, there are people who don’t believe in God at all. Of course, there are people who refuse to accept the church. Of course, there are people who walk different lifestyles. And of course, there are people who settle in quietly and don’t avow anything or make any waves religiously, politically, or educationally. But when it comes right down to what determines the cultural, political and religious life of our community, the church sits in the middle of all that and always has from day one of our country’s beginnings. That’s our culture, and religious influence continues to be a powerful element.

What would happen if we took a vote and everyone voted about whether they believed in God as the creator of this planet? Give a guess. Our community would vote approximately 70 percent to 80 percent in favor. That’s what the national statistical average shows.

What organization is most effective when a crisis like Katrina or other disasters come? If you guessed churches and faith-based organizations, you would be right. Again I’m amazed that our churches do their thing, carry out the work they feel called to do, and make little fuss about the lack of acknowledgement and praise either locally or from the national press. The local church doesn’t much care about that kind of recognition. It is an amazing entity and its influence is quietly touching our community for good and right and healing.

Try to look without bias or prejudice at the local church. It’s amazingly strong and gently carrying out a powerful work for good throughout our land.

Consider the church down the street and attend it. Find out how you can help our community through the church you pass by on your way to work. You’ll be wonderfully surprised how friendly and accepting the pastor, the leaders, and parishioners are.

Churches are a significant part of our community and will continue to be, without fanfare or notoriety. That’s the God-centered servant way.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Comparative IQs

From the U.K. Times Online (that's the "we" in the byline). Where do you think the USA would fall on this list? I have my guesses.

Germans are brainiest (but at least we're smarter than the French)

BRITAIN and France have experienced long periods of conflict and rivalry but now victory in one area can be claimed: Britons are more intelligent than the French.

A new European league of IQ scores has ranked the British in eighth place, well above the French, who were 19th. According to Richard Lynn of the University of Ulster, Britons have an average IQ of 100. The French scored 94. But it is not all good news. Top of the table were the Germans, with an IQ of 107. The British were also beaten by the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, Italy, Austria and Switzerland.

Professor Lynn, who caused controversy last year by claiming that men were more intelligent than women by about five IQ points on average, said that populations in the colder, more challenging environments of Northern Europe had developed larger brains than those in warmer climates further south. The average brain size in Northern and Central Europe is 1,320cc and in southeast Europe it is 1,312cc. “The early human beings in northerly areas had to survive during cold winters when there were no plant foods and they were forced to hunt big game,” he said. “The main environmental influence on IQ is diet, and people in southeast Europe would have had less of the proteins, minerals and vitamins provided by meat which are essential for brain development.”


NI_MPU('middle');
He added that differences in intelligence across Britain could be attributed to bright people moving to London over hundreds of years. Adults in England and Wales have an IQ of 100.5, higher than Ireland and Scotland, both with 97. People living in London and the South East average 102. “Once in the capital they have settled and reared children, and these children have inherited their high intelligence and transmitted it to further generations.”

The pattern is repeated in other countries, Professor Lynn claimed. In France, IQ scores in Paris were much higher than those in rural areas.

Professor Lynn has spent three decades analysing thousands of test results to scrutinise the role of evolution in IQ. He has published his findings in a new book. Britons excel in another area of Professor Lynn’s research. He found that university students had, at 109, the second-highest undergraduate IQs in the world, beaten only by their US counterparts on 110.

Professor Lynn ascribes the differences between British and French intelligence levels to the results of military conflict. He described it as “a hitherto unrecognised law of history” that “the side with the higher IQ normally wins, unless they are hugely outnumbered, as Germany was after 1942”.

A “normal” IQ ranges from 85 to 115 but exceptionally gifted people have scores starting at 145.

HT: Jack Wenders

Posted by Right-Mind | 1 comment(s)
Filed under:

Know Nukes

A recent Gallup Poll shows that a Majority of Americans Support Use of Nuclear Energy

The American public generally supports the use of nuclear energy as a way to provide electricity in the United States, and also endorses the expansion of nuclear energy in the future. The percentage favoring expanded use of nuclear energy is the highest Gallup has measured since 2001. Even so, Americans remain reluctant to support the construction of nuclear power plants in their local area. Republicans are more likely than Democrats to support the use of nuclear power in the country.
Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Age of Profanity

The Associated Press reports on a poll that Americans See, Hear More Profanity
This is a story about words we can't print in this story. You probably hear these words often, and more than ever before. But even though we can't print them - we do have our standards - we can certainly ask: Are we living in an Age of Profanity?

Nearly three-quarters of Americans questioned last week - 74 percent - said they encounter profanity in public frequently or occasionally, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll. Two-thirds said they think people swear more than they did 20 years ago. And as for, well, the gold standard of foul words, a healthy 64 percent said they use the F-word - ranging from several times a day (8 percent) to a few times a year (15 percent).

...

Perhaps not surprisingly, profanity seems to divide people by age and by gender.

Younger people admit to using bad language more often than older people; they also encounter it more and are less bothered by it. The AP-Ipsos poll showed that 62 percent of 18 to 34-year-olds acknowledged swearing in conversation at least a few times a week, compared to 39 percent of those 35 and older.

More women than men said they encounter people swearing more now than 20 years ago - 75 percent, compared to 60 percent. Also, more women said they were bothered by profanity - 74 percent at least some of the time - than men (60 percent.) And more men admitted to swearing: 54 percent at least a few times a week, compared to 39 percent of women.

Wondering specifically about the F-word? (For the record, we needed special dispensation from our bosses just to say 'F-word.') Thirty-two percent of men said they used it at least a few times a week, compared to 23 percent of women.

"That word doesn't even mean what it means anymore," says Larry Riley of Warren, Mich. "It has just become part of the culture." Riley admits to using the F-word a few times a week. And his wife? "She never swears."

A striking common note among those interviewed, swearers or not: They don't like it when people swear for no good reason.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

"Evolving Standards" or the U.S. Constitution?

Dr. Walter Williams jumps right into it -- do judges follow the Constitution? Or do they follow evolving standards, whims, and personal prejudices?

From the Jewish World Review:

Walter WilliamsAre federal, state and local justices appointed to office to impose their personal views on society or to interpret law? Is it a judge's duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and state constitutions in the cases of state and local judges, or is it their duty to uphold foreign law and United Nations treaties? Should what a judge sees as "evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights govern court decisions, or the U.S. Constitution?

It was the former, not the U.S. Constitution, that determined last year's Roper v. Simmons decision, in which the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the execution of a convicted murderer because he was 17 years old at the time of his offense. Judges have used their power to impose their own values on our society. They've ordered federal and state agencies to spend billions of dollars to carry out their favorite policies. They've ordered legislatures to raise taxes. In pursuit of their vision of justice, they've forced universities, businesses and government agencies to engage in race and sex discrimination.

Alabama Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker has little patience with his colleagues who use their office to impose their values instead of applying the written law, but he's in trouble for saying so. Judge Parker wrote an opinion article that was published in The Birmingham News on Jan. 1. It criticized the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision that banned executions for murderers who were under 18 when they committed their crimes. He also criticized his Alabama Supreme Court colleagues who followed the high court's ruling when they set aside the execution of a young Alabama death row inmate, Renaldo Adams, who was 17 at the time when he brutally raped and repeatedly stabbed a pregnant woman, then left her to die in the presence of three children.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Killing Babies, Compassionately: The Netherlands Follows In Germany's Footsteps

The article also has a history of German Euthanasia from 1938-1945.

From The Weekly Standard:

AT LAST A HIGH GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL in Europe got up the nerve to chastise the Dutch government for preparing to legalize infant euthanasia. Italy's Parliamentary Affairs minister, Carlo Giovanardi, said during a radio debate: "Nazi legislation and Hitler's ideas are reemerging in Europe via Dutch euthanasia laws and the debate on how to kill ill children."

Unsurprisingly, the Dutch, ever prickly about international criticism of their peculiar institution, were outraged. Giovanardi's critique cut so deeply that even Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende felt the need to respond, sniffing, "This [Giovanardi's assertion] is scandalous and unacceptable. This is not the way to get along in Europe."

As is often the case in the New Europe, what is said matters more than what is done. Thus, the prime minister of the Netherlands thinks that killing babies because they are born with terminal or seriously disabling conditions is not a scandal, but daring to point out accurately that German doctors did the same during World War II, is.

That being noted, one wishes Giovanardi had thought twice before raising the Nazi specter. Partly, this is because nothing we are talking about today matches the scope or magnitude of Nazi crimes. As a result, accusing people of Nazi-like behavior allows those amply deserving of moral condemnation to deflect reproaches. Thus, Giovanardi says that killing disabled babies is what the *** did, and the Dutch merely retort (correctly) that they are not ***.

Still, the "Nazi" analogy is worth exploring, precisely because it is unequivocally true that German doctors did kill thousands of disabled babies, for which a few such physicians were hanged at Nuremberg. Dutch apologists know this, of course. But they claim that the Netherlands' infant euthanasia program is substantially different: Dutch doctors are motivated by compassion whereas the Germans' were motivated by the bigotry of racial hygiene. Of course it is the act of killing disabled and dying babies that is wrong, not the motivation. But even leaving that aside, the Dutch defense is not as persuasive as Prime Minister Balkenende would like to believe.

Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments

Genocide Awareness: Photos of Aborted Babies Shock University Students

"But it's just a piece of tissue; there's nothing to be upset about."

From LifeSite:

Gruesome Photos of Aborted Babies Take University of Calgary by Storm

A day after a heated abortion debate at U of C, Campus Pro-Life (CPL) returned for a repeat showing of twelve 4x8 foot bloody images from the Genocide Awareness Project (GAP) yesterday.

Monday, students were visibly shocked by the gruesome abortion and historical genocide images, prompting many stares and questions. Word spread quickly on campus, with students sending text messages on their phones to their friends to "check out" the controversial exhibit.

"We were impressed by the number of conversations," said CPL Secretary Matt Wilson. "Many students came back several times throughout the day. We achieved our goal of re-igniting discussion on this taboo topic."

Although there have been incidents of violence from pro-choice individuals towards the signs-at UBC in 1999 and Calgary in 2005-Monday's display went ahead without disruption. Security fencing and uniformed guards helped maintain the peaceful presence.

The university administration erected advisory signs around the parameter of the display, stating, "The exhibit is protected under the relevant sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms related to Freedom of Expression."

CPL Vice President Drew Brown stated, "While the university may not share the view of CPL, their provision of security and protection of our fundamental freedoms sets an example for universities across the country. Several Canadian pro-life clubs have been denied their right to display GAP like CPL did yesterday. We commend the University for recognizing our Charter rights."

The same, however, could not be said for their Student Union (SU). The SU refused to allow Monday's display on the South Lawn, an outdoor area of the university that it controls. The student society at UBC in Vancouver took a similar position of opposition to GAP several years ago. Brown remarked, "It is ironic that our message is being suppressed by the very society that is supposed to represent us. While our club is sanctioned by the SU, it's being censored by it too. As students we're forced to pay membership to a union that is not willing to represent its own students' fundamental freedom of expression."

 


 


Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments
Filed under:

Senate v. America on Illegal Immigration

A Washington Times Op-Ed column by Tony Blankley titled "Mexican Illegals vs. American Voters".

It is lucky America has more than two centuries of mostly calm experience with self-government. We are going to need to fall back on that invaluable patrimony if the immigration debate continues as it has started this season. The Senate is attempting to legislate into the teeth of the will of the American public. The Senate Judiciary Committeemen — and probably a majority of the Senate — are convinced that they know that the American people don't know what is best for them.

National polling data could not be more emphatic — and has been so for decades. Gallup Poll (March 27) finds 80 percent of the public wants the federal government to get tougher on illegal immigration. A Quinnipiac University Poll (March 3) finds 62 percent oppose making it easier for illegals to become citizens (72 percent in that poll don't even want illegals to be permitted to have driver's licenses). Time Magazine's recent poll (Jan. 24-26) found 75 percent favor "major penalties" on employers of illegals, 70 percent believe illegals increase the likelihood of terrorism and 57 percent would use military force at the Mexican-American border.

An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll (March 10-13) found 59 percent opposing a guest-worker proposal, and 71 percent would more likely vote for a congressional candidate who would tighten immigration controls.

An IQ Research poll (March 10) found 92 percent saying that securing the U.S. border should be a top priority of the White House and Congress.

Yet, according to a National Journal survey of Congress, 73 percent of Republican and 77 percent of Democratic congressmen and senators say they would support guest-worker legislation.

I commend to all those presumptuous senators and congressmen the sardonic and wise words of Edmund Burke in his 1792 letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe: "No man will assert seriously, that when people are of a turbulent spirit, the best way to keep them in order is to furnish them with something substantial to complain of." The senators should remember that they are American senators, not Roman proconsuls. Nor is the chairman of the Judiciary Committee some latter-day Praetor Maximus.


Posted by Right-Mind | with no comments
More Posts Next page »