Ghazi: Chemical Weapons Used by USA!

NewImage

Update: Ghazi chose to respond to this post on Moscow’s Vision2020 Venom2020 website. I’m posting his comments here in full so you can follow up on them for yourselves.

Let me guarantee you, as a military professional and retiree: the USA has not been using chemical weapons. That’s a fantasy from the far left progressives. See for yourselves the sources that he cites: all left-leaning with an axe to grind. Even the Wikipedia article he cites refutes the claim.

Here are some sources for Dale and others to explore–right-mindedly, but more importantly, open-mindedly; no “fake-news,” “no alternative facts,” but absolutely verifiable facts.  Given his meritorious career with the U.S. Navy, however, one would have thought Dale would be quite familiar with these facts.

(1) A few sources that provide evidence about Israel’s use of chemical weapons:  http://www.clevelandchallenger.com/u-s-media-suppressed-2009-un-report-showing-israel-using-chemical-weapons-against-palestinians/;   
Haaretz, 10/22/06; New York Times, 1/21/09; “Israel used depleted uranium shells in Syria,” Jerusalem Post, 5/6/13; also see https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/may/06/syria-israel-bombing-moral-relativism;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-mitchell/evidence-grows-that-israe_b_158176.html.   As for Israel’s stockpile of nuclear/chemical weapons, see this BBC documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk_6CCZ0gCY
A must–The following website provides pictures of Gaza children, killed by Israeli chemical weapons (phosphorous gas), summer 2014……..
https://www.google.com/search?q=picture+children+burnt+by+gas+gaza&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJrLz37ZrTAhWLLyYKHdaoCpkQsAQIGw&biw=1680&bih=886#imgrc=evce1NBNn4sq5M:

(2) As for Fallujah (Iraq), see Wikipedia (with numerous references): “Fallujah, the Hidden Massacre”–https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah,_The_Hidden_Massacre;  See Newsweek, ll/22/04;
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/29/opinion/shake-and-bake.html?_r=0;https://verbena19.wordpress.com/category/incendiary-weaponschemical-weapons/ ; The Fallujah operation was called, “Operation Phanthom Fury”).  Also see The Independent (UK), 11/8/05; The Guardian, 11/15/05.

Also check Amnesty International reports, Human Rights Watch, Israel’s Human-Rights group B-Tselem, Red Cross, etc.

One can also further explore these issues on various websites and other sources (including books, professional articles).


Bless his heart. Moscow’s Emeritus Professor, Shaikh M. Ghazanfar, must be getting his fake news these days from the far-far left, out of orbit progressive websites. He says that the USA, under Gen. Mattis, has used chemical weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan. And that Israel has been using chemical weapons in Gaza!

He writes in the Moscow-Pullman Daily News:

The recent chemical-weapons carnage in Syria is universally condemned – and rightly so. The gruesome pictures humanized even President Donald Trump (“no child of God should suffer such horror”), and he responded appropriately.

However, Nikki Haley, our UN ambassador, had noted, “We don’t know yet the source of yesterday’s attack.”

And the UN is investigating. Former Sen. Ron Paul and others suggest Syrian President Bashar Assad couldn’t have done it. Thus, some wonder if the “Iraq has WMD” fiasco is being repeated.

Be that as it may, we too have used chemical weapons, most recently in Fallujah, Iraq, led by Gen. James Mattis (now defense secretary, nicknamed “Mad Dog” for his callous disregard of human life); he also employed them in Afghanistan. Ironically, he recently reminded the world of the Geneva Convention ban against chemical weapons. The horrific legacy of depleted uranium continues in Iraq, with stillbirths and birth defects still occurring in what Iraqi doctors call “genocide.”

Gen. Mattis didn’t earn the nickname “Mad Dog” because he was using chemical weapons! Here’s a link to a CNN article that explains where that nickname came from: Mad Dog was a Nickname Given by the Press.

And Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu displayed his usual hypocrisy. He “was shocked and outraged” to see “babies suffocating.” He forgets his own burning of Palestinian children in Gaza with phosphorus gas in 2014 and in earlier Israeli invasions of Gaza and Lebanon, even Syria; and his justice minister applauded the poisoning of “little snakes.”

Doesn’t look like Ghazi has much love for the Israelis, either.

Even Saudis have employed chemical weapons in Yemen.

These events are documented in U.N. investigations and various human rights reports.

Indeed, it is our short-sighted imperial privilege: for the same deeds, condemning and punishing some, engaging ourselves; ignoring or condoning others.

S.M. Ghazanfar
Acworth, Ga.

Le Pen Won a Plurality of Female Voters in Election Day Poll

This won’t sit well with the socialists.  

Le Pen Won a Plurality of Female Voters in Election Day Poll

Marine Le Pen, the right-wing National Front politician and French presidential candidate known for her views opposing Islamic immigration, received the plurality of the female vote in an election day survey. A poll conducted by Opinion Way reveals that out of the approximately 9,000 voters surveyed, Le Pen won 23.9 percent of the female vote.

Obama secretly freed dangerous Iranians in historic prisoner swap deal

When Barack Obama signed a prisoner swap deal with Iran, he said the released Iranians were “not charged with terrorism or any violent offenses.” However, a Politico investigation claims that some were national security threats – a fact Obama ignored to keep Tehran on board with a nuclear deal. 

Obama’s hidden Iran deal giveaway

When President Barack Obama announced the “one-time gesture” of releasing Iranian-born prisoners who “were not charged with terrorism or any violent offenses” last year, his administration presented the move as a modest trade-off for the greater good of the Iran nuclear agreement and Tehran’s pledge to free five Americans.

Oxford U Staff Told Avoiding Eye Contact Is ‘Everyday Racism’

NewImage

Who does this apply to? A white person talking to another white person?  A black person talking to a white person? 

Staff at Britain’s Oxford University have been told avoiding eye contact with students could constitute “everyday racism”.

The BBC reports, it is included in a list of “racial micro-aggressions” published in a newsletter by Oxford’s equality and diversity unit.

The newsletter claims racial micro aggressions might include: “Not making eye contact or speaking directly to people.”

Avoiding eye contact ‘everyday racism’ – BBC News

Staff at Oxford University have been told avoiding eye contact with students could constitute “everyday racism”. It is included in a list of “racial micro-aggressions” that has been published in a newsletter by Oxford’s equality and diversity unit. It described micro-aggressions as “subtle, everyday racism” which can be alienating.

GMA: ‘Surprising’ Trump Still Polls Higher Than Hillary

This still has more to do with America’s dislike for Hillary than their liking Trump.

GMA: ‘Surprising’ Trump Still Polls Higher Than Hillary

Former Clinton administration communications director George Stephanopoulos shared his surprise Monday morning, that his network ABC, conducted a poll that showed if the presidential election were held again today Trump would still defeat Hillary – this time with the popular vote.

More:

Good Morning America discussed a series of polls, leading with Trump’s approval rating of 42%, but towards the end of the segment they touched on one poll that the GMA anchor found “surprising.”

More: Good Morning America discussed a series of polls, leading with Trump’s approval rating of 42%, but towards the end of the segment they touched on one poll that the GMA anchor found “surprising.”

“Jon, let’s stick with that poll for a second. You point out a lot of the challenges for President Trump in the poll, some of the warning signs for Democrats as well,” Stephanopoulos said. “One of the biggest warning signs for Democrats, this surprising result if you re-ran the election today.”

Reporter Jonathan Karl responded, “Yeah, this is very interesting. If the election were re-run today with those who voted in 2016, Donald Trump would beat Hillary Clinton.”

“And George, it’s 43/40, that means he would beat her in the popular vote, which of course, he didn’t do in the real election.”

French Mayor Threatens to Quit After ‘Assholes’ Vote For Le Pen

A lot of similarities to the Trump win here in the USA. 

French Mayor Threatens to Quit After ‘Assholes’ Vote For Le Pen

The socialist mayor of a town in northern France is threatening to quit after far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen won a plurality of votes in his town during the first round of France’s election over the weekend.

More:

The Daily Mail reports Daniel Delomez, the mayor of Annezin, told local newspaper L’Avenir de l’Artois that he didn’t want to “devote [his] life to assholes” after Le Pen won 38 percent of vote in the area.

He reportedly said, “It is catastrophic. It’s possible that I will step down as I do not want to dedicate my life to assholes.”

Far-left candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon received only 19.25 percent of the vote in the town, just ahead of current front-runner Emmanuel Macron, who received 17.29 percent of the vote.

With 97 percent of the vote in, Macron won 23.86 percent of the total vote, while Le Pen won 21.43 percent of the vote in the first round of the French presidential election. Macron and Le Pen are advancing to the second round of voting to decide the president.

DNC Chair Lays It Down, Saying All Democratic Candidates Must Support Abortion

Not only is it a platform of the Democratic Party, but you cannot be a candidate unless you support the murder of the unborn. 

DNC Chair Demands All Democratic Candidates MUST Support Abortion

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez is now demanding conformity from his party members on the issue of abortion, claiming that “every Democrat” must support a woman’s right to terminate her unborn child and promising to only support Democratic candidates who line up on his side of this ideological aisle.

More:

“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” Perez said in a statement. “That is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state.” 

“At a time when women’s rights are under assault from the White House, the Republican Congress, and in states across the country,” he added, “we must speak up for this principle as loudly as ever and with one voice.” 

At the time he made the statement, Perez was reportedly facing criticism over the DNC’s endorsement of Heath Mello, a historically anti-abortion Democrat who’s running for mayor on Omaha. According to the Hill, the allegedly pro-diversity DNC’s new “for abortion-lovers only” stance is likely to alienate the relatively few pro-life Democratic politicians out there, including West Virginia’s relatively middle-of-the-road Joe Manchin.

Perez probably should have checked in with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi before planting this particular flag, considering the avidly pro-abortion California Democrat recently went on record as saying that “of course” someone can be both a Democrat and anti-abortion (although she missed the memo that you can’t really be a Catholic and be for abortion).

Clearly what we have here is a failure to communicate. Or, on the general issue of whether it’s ok to kill a living child, a failure to make any logical sense.